View Single Post
Old 01-05-2011, 10:44 PM   #122 (permalink)
autoteach
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262

Bus - '94 Ford School Bus huge

Stupid - '01 Chevy Blazer LS
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)

hawk - '00 Honda Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
The 22R is 2366 cc per the manual, so the difference between calling it a 2.3L or 2.4L is kinda splitting hairs.

The engine numbers are historic, upgrades of the basic R series engine design: Toyota R engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, here I go splitting hairs... would you constitute a 302 ford as a 4.9 liter? You could, but that is not the way anyone in the functioning automotive world does it.


As for others comments on the taco, I believe they did have a turbo version of the 22re. I was never looking for an over-powered truck, it just wasnt helpful that as soon as you loaded anything in it you couldnt merge with traffic at a reasonable speed (or at least it took a full foot of throttle to get there). Even 25 more hp would have made a big difference. Altogether, the new Tacoma could never have done some of the things that my 1989 could, and my 1989 could do all the things a new one can (as far as usefulness is concerned). I can say this about the newer trucks, working on them sucks. You need a topside creeper to work under the hood to avoid damaging the shoulder high fenders and grill.
  Reply With Quote