View Single Post
Old 01-09-2011, 04:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jim-Bob
Junkyard Engineer
 
Jim-Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 167

Super-Metro! - '92 Geo Metro Base

$250 Pizza Delivery Car - '91 Geo Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 43.75 mpg (US)

Fronty the wonder truck - '98 Nissan Frontier XE
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Exactly. I wouldn't be cutting and splicing wires in a brand new car. Megasquirt, for all it's advantages, is nowhere near as good or as sophisticated as a new car's management system. It won't run most of the systems in the car (Automatic transmission, gauges, A/C, cruise control, ABS, traction control, etc.) and would create an epic mess that you would then have to engineer around. Plus, you will void your warranty and no longer be able to pass an emissions test. It's also crude and would likely result in lower MPGs than your factory computer as it lacks the ability to run a sequential fuel injection system. It can run in either batch fire or disynchronus batch fire (basically 2 injector banks) modes. If you have a 2 cylinder engine this is great. for a 4 cylinder, not so much. Save Megasquirt for older cars with engine swaps that need an easy solution for engine management. I would just get a Scangauge and use it to adjust your driving style. Plus, if you really wanted to use a car for eco driving, why did you go with an automatic transmission? You would have been better off with a CVT or a manual or a hybrid model. For that matter, the Insight would have been a better choice all together. Similar price, much better MPG.
__________________
No green technology will ever make a substantive environmental impact until it is economically viable for most people to use it. This must be from a reduction in net cost of the new technology, not an increase in the cost of the old technology through taxation



(Note: the car sees 100% city driving and is EPA rated at 37 mpg city)

Last edited by Jim-Bob; 01-09-2011 at 04:56 PM..
  Reply With Quote