View Single Post
Old 01-18-2011, 05:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
JacobAziza
Master EcoModder
 
JacobAziza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397

Big Orange Work Truck - '83 Ford F-250
90 day: 27.54 mpg (US)

Jessica's - '04 Toyota Matrix
90 day: 41.21 mpg (US)

Ninjette - '01 Kawasaki Ninja EX250R
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
I thought that too, at first.

I posed the question here, and it was explained to me:

P&G is only partially about throttle plate efficiency.

More than that it is about using all available power (engine at full load produces more power per unit fuel than at partial load, and acceleration increases load) and minimizing internal engine friction losses (which is where the majority of the power goes in any internal combustion engine).

To put it in more practical terms: it only takes about 5 seconds for me to accelerate from 45 to 55. During that time I am getting very poor mileage (maybe 10mpg).
But it takes 15 seconds to coast back down to 45 again,during which I am getting infinity mpg (EOC). That gives me an average, over the course of those full 20 seconds of around 40mpg, which is far more than I would get at steady state (which is around 25).

The theory was confirmed when I actually started trying it, and my overall long term average increased 5mpg (from about 25 to 30)

EDIT: BTW, my truck is NA
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?

So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
  Reply With Quote