View Single Post
Old 01-23-2011, 02:55 PM   #31 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Length of cars matters more than length in sailplanes. There are not many cars under 13 feet long that can fit four people ~6'-4" tall, in relative comfort. My Scion xA does.

Sure frontal area matters, but if the Cd is lowered from X to Y, then that matters about 3 times more.

As for weight, a sphere encloses the most volume inside of the least surface area, and a cube encloses the next most volume for a given surface area. Less surface area means less metal, glass, and plastic. Elongated rectangles have more surface area for a given interior volume.

So, a longer length, lower height car with the same interior volume as another car that is shorter length and greater height; the longer, lower car will weigh more, all else being equal.

I fit much better in a Honda Fit than a Civic, and the legroom / headroom dimensions reflect this. Their interior passenger volume is virtually identical -- within 0.1 cu ft. The cargo volume is much larger on the Fit -- 8.6 cu ft more.

The height difference is only ~4" anyway; and the Fit is a little more than 2" narrower. That's about 1.8 sq ft greater frontal area for the Fit; a tenth or two in Cd would offset this (though I don't know what their relative Cd's are?). The Fit weighs about 140 pounds less (base models with manual shift), and it is ~10" shorter length.

So the Honda Fit is case in point.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote