View Single Post
Old 01-28-2011, 01:02 PM   #412 (permalink)
t vago
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 830
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Well, let's see...

You're taking water from a reservior of some sort, expending energy to convert the water into a form that can be sucked into the engine, allowing this form to interact with the combustion process to lower in-cylinder temperatures and bring the process farther away from detonation, and expelling the water out the tailpipe when you're done.

Because of the beneficial effects of lowering in-cylinder temperatures and moving the combusion process away from detonation, you can then run a much leaner air/fuel mix than before, and you end up reducing throttling losses and allow your engine to push your car forward with better fuel economy than before.

How is this not water injection? Simply because you're electrolyzing the water?

Quit trying to stifle the debate, please. The idea must be able to stand on its own merits.
  Reply With Quote