View Single Post
Old 01-28-2011, 02:16 PM   #414 (permalink)
Nerys
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
it can't stand on its own merits. its inefficient. but argue with logic not with intent to discredit.

no water is being injected into the engine. period. Hydrogen is being injected.

the fact that the result of this combustion is water is irrelevant.

My problem with HHO is not can it work but that it can not work efficiently and if you DO make a battery big enough to make HHO practical it will give you 3-6 times MORE RANGE if you just used it to run an electric motor.

IE its just not a good idea. but that does not mean it won't work.
  Reply With Quote