jakobnev -
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
I'd say no on the grounds that science is not the field but the approach. If someone is into radioactive hoola-hoops or whatever, as long as they conduct actual testing, and do so in a transparent manner, including documenting possible sources of error in a sincere fashion, i'd say all power to them. (Assuming that their hypothesis of how their device works is subject to disproof to begin with)
|
I voted no for the same reason. I really *do* want a silver bullet, so I am more than willing to entertain crazy ideas. I am also interested in the "kernel of truth" that usually lies at the bottom of a lot of scams.
CarloSW2