View Single Post
Old 02-07-2011, 03:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
Jim-Bob
Junkyard Engineer
 
Jim-Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 167

Super-Metro! - '92 Geo Metro Base

$250 Pizza Delivery Car - '91 Geo Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 43.75 mpg (US)

Fronty the wonder truck - '98 Nissan Frontier XE
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejoey View Post
Impressive! I just spent the afternoon reading about 104 dissenting posts to this hack US News article that discouraged people from buying Metros: Why You Shouldn't Buy a Geo Metro to Save on Gas - U.S. News Rankings and Reviews Dozens of people posted about exceeding 40 in pure city driving in their Metros. It appears you're in good company.
I read that article before and found it to be complete and utter rubbish. Yes, if you buy the automatic it isn't really that good but the manual is exceptional. Plus, if you buy a Metro, you know what you are getting. It's not luxurious, but it is a simple, honest piece of basic transportation that will neither rob you blind at the gas pump nor force you to make huge monthly payments like a new hybrid. However, the Metro doesn't pay advertising revenues to US News and World report thus it must not be any good. Hybrids do though and so their advice is to spend 20-50x more than the price of a Metro to get the same fuel economy as a Metro. Those of us who own them though know differently and love them for what they are. Most of us know how to do our own repairs and can (and will) keep them running indefinitely so long as we can find parts. Once you own one it ruins you for any other car because by comparison any other car is just a money waster. If I had the choice, I would prefer to drive my old Metro every day over a new Rolls Royce. I would be embarrassed to be seen in a car that wasted my money like the Rolls.
__________________
No green technology will ever make a substantive environmental impact until it is economically viable for most people to use it. This must be from a reduction in net cost of the new technology, not an increase in the cost of the old technology through taxation



(Note: the car sees 100% city driving and is EPA rated at 37 mpg city)
  Reply With Quote