View Single Post
Old 04-28-2008, 05:54 PM   #20 (permalink)
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
#1 is a valid concern and I have already looked into this as it was a concern of mine too. At 1875 rpm I have roughly 23 horsepower (65 ft/lbs) avaliable to me. That'll set me at about 70% load (@ 65 mph) which is pretty close to ideal for most engines. The only detriment will most likely be the low rpms since peak BSFC occurs at higher rpms in most naturally aspirated engines. If I need more power I simply have to downshift.

#2 really isn't much of a concern. On all the high mileage versions of cars I've seen they always gear them lower. Examples would be the Honda VX, Honda Insight, Geo Metro XFI, and even the new Chevy models that are getting better mileage like the Malibu LTZ and Cobalt XFE.

The real benefits will have to be seen. It all depends on how the BSFC map is for the engine once I'm done with it. If it has long horizontal sections like the Metro map below I'll be in great shape. If its like the Saturn map I won't see as much benefit. Since the torque output of the engine is very flat I'm guessing its more like the Geo map. The red dot is how its geared now, the purple is after modification.

Geo 1L BSFC map



Saturn DOHC BSFC map
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote