Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post

Backtobasics · 02-21-2011, 10:42 AM

I agree with the general opinions, that the 3.08 might be too low.

I am running into a similiar situation with my 97 Ram. I frequently read that the magic target number is 55mpg, but my 360 truck with 5 speed and 3.55 gears doesn't like 55, and the scangauge backs it up. I consistently get better instant and avg MPG at 62-65 then I do at 55.

02-21-2011, 10:42 AM	#6 (permalink)
Backtobasics EcoModding Apprentice Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Kc KS Posts: 148 Dart Lite - '76 Dodge Dart Dart Lite 90 day: 18.34 mpg (US) Beater..with a Heater - '94 Isuzu Rodeo LS 90 day: 16.19 mpg (US) Thanks: 4 Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts	I agree with the general opinions, that the 3.08 might be too low. I am running into a similiar situation with my 97 Ram. I frequently read that the magic target number is 55mpg, but my 360 truck with 5 speed and 3.55 gears doesn't like 55, and the scangauge backs it up. I consistently get better instant and avg MPG at 62-65 then I do at 55. __________________ Current MPG driver: 1994 Isuzu Rodeo - Beater with a Heater...