View Single Post
Old 02-24-2011, 05:15 PM   #12 (permalink)
zonker
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
in my experience, factory intake systems are designed to address four concerns... emissions, drivability, economy, and nvh.

for most modders, be it eco or hipo, the nvh concern can take a much larger back seat to the factory engineered system, so there is usually some room for improvement.

as a general rule of thumb, unrestricted airflow ahead of the maf sensor serves to improve both economy and power.

it's what you do between the maf/vam/iat sensors and the throttle body that makes things more interesting, and can give quite varied results from a modification.

for example, the white rag gets better mpg from a 2.25" dia. aluminum tube (with 144cc injectors) between TB and MAF, and gets more power when i use a 2.75" dia. tube (with 168cc injectors). the smaller tube increases air velocity thru the maf sensor which advances timing and enriches fuel (which i lean back out with the slightly smaller than oe 152cc injectors).

Last edited by zonker; 02-24-2011 at 05:22 PM..
  Reply With Quote