Thread: Design-headwind
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2011, 07:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
Design-headwind

Yet another thought-experiment from my tortured mind!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I considered the difference Cd makes with respect to power,mpg,etc.,based on an 'ideal' low-drag body and current production cars.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I calculated the difference in road-load aerodynamic horsepower for a car of Cd 0.30,and the same car at Cd 0.10 ( what was once considered the theoretical low-drag limit for passenger cars ),at 100 km/h ( 62 mph ) steady velocity.
Drag coefficient is the only variable for the aerodynamic road load power formula:
HP= V/550 [ 1/2 x rho x Cd x Af x V-squared ]

V = ft/sec
rho = 0.00238 slugs ( my apology for US units!)
Af = square-feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
As it turns out after the math,the relationship is very simple.Cd 0.3 is 3X higher than 0.1 and so is the horsepower requirement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
What this means is that the Cd 0.10 sees the same load at 89.4 mph ( 144 km/h ) as the Cd 0.30 car sees at 60 ( 100 km/h ).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- A perverted way to look at this,is that the Cd 0.30 car has a 27.4 mph 'headwind' penalty 'designed' into it's shape,compared with Cd 0.10 baseline.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over a statistical 12-year service life,the life-cycle cost to aerodynamic drag would constitute a 3X loss on investment for every highway mile traveled over the 12-year period,with :
* 3X more fuel unnecessarily consumed( based on constant BSFC)
* 3X more fuel cost
* 3X more tailpipe emissions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's truly a great, get poor quick scheme!
And as a component of the world's invisible economy,a certain golden goose for those who sell the things that make things go.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I no longer understand what constitutes a 'Sputnik-Moment' in the world of capitalist economics.


Last edited by aerohead; 02-28-2011 at 07:43 PM.. Reason: spelling correction/term clarification-simplication
  Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
euromodder (02-25-2011), KamperBob (02-25-2011), landsailor (02-24-2011), NeilBlanchard (02-24-2011), Piwoslaw (02-25-2011), redyaris (02-25-2011), Vekke (02-25-2011)