View Single Post
Old 02-25-2011, 12:48 AM   #17 (permalink)
zonker
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sularus View Post
zonker - the velocity won't help all that much on more moderate cruise speeds that see high vacuum with a very small opening in throttle position. The velocity will be killed regardless.
i agree with your assessment if this car did not have a mass airflow sensor attached to the air filter assy.

The mass airflow sensor has a sampling tube, which is measuring air speed, not air volume.

Am I missing something here or would decreasing the diameter of the tube increase the rate at which the air is travelling thru the maf sensor?

And wouldn't that increased air speed through the MAF sensor translate into it sending a signal for more fuel and ignition advance?

Last edited by zonker; 02-25-2011 at 12:55 AM..
  Reply With Quote