View Single Post
Old 03-02-2011, 06:27 PM   #47 (permalink)
fjasper
Bookworm
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kalispell
Posts: 127

Sylvio 2 - '04 Audi allroad quattro Biturbo 6-spd
90 day: 25.09 mpg (US)

Atlas - '04 Audi allroad 2.7T 6MT
90 day: 25.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts
I've had sort of similar results. Seems like once a carb is set up for the induction and exhaust system, it's a matter of keeping it clean and checking sync once in a while. The CV carb is a supremely elegant machine.

My wife's Toyota had a CV (variable venturi) carb in it, but it had a lot of trouble. The slide was mounted horizontally, ran on dozens and dozens (literally) of tiny little bearings, and it never worked right after a certain shop gave it a "tune-up." It also wasn't designed to be serviced, only replaced.

I still haven't forgiven Toyota for that little bit of cheapskatery.


Redyaris:

I believe a standard (narrowband) O2 sensor can be had for $50-75 in generic form. From what I understand, a wideband sensor will detect and accurately report a much wider range of fuel/air ratios, which is particularly valuable for the early stages of tuning. The narrow band sensors are made to work as part of a system that's been engineered in detail, so they don't need to be able to detect big deviations. When it senses a condition outside the known parameters, it pitches a CEL/MIL and you dutifully take it to the dealer to get it fixed. Right?

Output from an oxygen sensor on a carburetted engine will probably look different than from the same sensor on a fuel-injected engine. I don't think the carb'd motor would produce the voltage swings characteristic of a FI system in closed-loop mode, but I could be wrong.

It'll be interesting to see if the cross-pipe has enough flow/heat to make the sensor work. Individual bungs on each pipe might work better.

I stand by, ready to learn from your experience!
__________________
  Reply With Quote