View Single Post
Old 03-07-2011, 09:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Olympia
Posts: 127

Sylvio - '02 Audi allroad quattro Biturbo 6-spd
90 day: 21.08 mpg (US)

Focus - '17 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 45.64 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts
Might it work to use a 13.2v or 14.4v battery? The alternator would feed it at ~14v, which would keep it mostly charged, but it would have the ability to absorb additional power from a higher-voltage source when available.

I think cells are 1.2v, so by using 11 or 12 cells, you could make a battery that's a slightly higher voltage. I don't know enough about it to predict how it would behave, though. The charging system voltage might not be enough to maintain a useful charge in a 13.2v battery.

I'm thinking NiCd or NiMH, but only because I don't know of a source for 1.2v lead-acid cells.

Like maybe 11 of these in series for 13.2 nominal voltage, 10 Amp-hour capacity? I guess that gets a little bit expensive, and would require some additional electronics to control charging. NiCd are supposed to be able to supply very high discharge rates (up to 50 times capacity), so CA should be significantly higher than a lead-acid battery of the same amp-hour capacity (as much as 20 times higher). Read more on Wikipedia.

The PC680 is my benchmark, since it has good power for applications that take relatively high starting current for small engines (BMW boxer twins). It's also certified (in slightly different form) for cranking 300+ cubic inch airplane engines, and it shows 17 amp-hours' capacity.

Invalid argument techniques to watch for.
'48 C170
  Reply With Quote