View Single Post
Old 03-27-2011, 12:14 AM   #14 (permalink)
Varn
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
I bet that a manometer might be interesting but I bet the dial would be bouncing all over. I don't say that from experience so if you do run a test, please post it.

Perhaps a wider lip might be better but it might spread the interference out to the edges of our rather square vehicles. It might be that a narrower bump might help as well.

My car is so old that I have to rely on fills for economy data so changes come slow.

Years ago (2004) I tested a 1.5" wide fin on the front of my 17" wide recumbent low racer bicycle on a large hill. I started at a paint mark on a hill and measured the top speed coasting with my feet in the same position. After 4 back to back runs I was consistently about a mph faster on that hill with the rather ugly blue board and duct tape shark fin.

In my mind a splitter is similar to a turbulator



Quote:
Originally Posted by ECONORAM View Post
I am wondering how I could do this on my truck in a tasteful manner. I tend to think going all the way across the hood would be better also. This looks like a good start.
Would it be worth sticking a manometer at the windshield base to do some before and after pressure checks?
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote