View Single Post
Old 03-29-2011, 03:51 PM   #27 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ktaylor View Post
Yeah probably.

If I wait until the tank is closer to empty my FE will go up right? I realized I've been filling with 20L or so still in the tank (1/3 full) because my fuel gauge craps out at around 30L and either always says the tank is full or says it's empty.
Running an emptier tank will save a bit on weight, but it will allow the fuel pump to get warmer than with a fuller tank, which can shorten its life. There's also the argument that giving the gas too much space to evaporate into means more fuel is lost to evaporation. Granted, the charcoal canister is supposed to absorb all the fumes and release them during driving, but I suspect you'll get no extra economy from the fumes released by the charcoal canister.

And the "except at the pumps" comment referred to a bit less fuel needed to refuel.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShadeTreeMech For This Useful Post:
ktaylor (03-31-2011)