View Single Post
Old 04-03-2011, 01:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
On flat roads, the cruise control is amazing at maintaining a consistent speed, and therefore you get a good MPG. On the hills, it is a different matter entirely.

When drving a long distance, I do still use the cruise control, but when the hill is steep enough that the car is going to downshift, I put my foot on the accelerator where the cruise is at, cancel the cruise control, then give as much throttle as I can without a downshift. Some hills are steep enough where I let the torque convertor unlock but I still try to keep it in fourth.

Interestingly, when driving my minivan (weighs in @ 4K lbs empty) I found on the steeper hills, turning off the overdrive completely and holding a steady speed is more fuel efficient than allowing the car to slow down in fourth, then having to accelerate to maintain above 40. Below that, I find it impossible to get good gas mileage with an auto.

BTW a steep hill is one with more than a 10% grade
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote