View Single Post
Old 04-05-2011, 01:02 AM   #20 (permalink)
kir_kenix
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
I always figured that the cap would yield better mpg too. However, at work we put caps on about 50ish 2001-2005 Ford Rangers. My buddy at work is in charge of paying fuel expenses for our fleet. He said that mpg has decreased accross the board about 1.5mpg since the switch. We still have 40 to 50 trucks with open boxes for comparison.

I think alot of it has to do with how long the box is and the shape of the cab (as mentioned above). Aparently the regular cab Rangers w/ 6 foot boxes do not benefit from the extra weight/drag of the caps. I'm sure this would be a different story on a 1/2 ton truck with and 8' bed though.
  Reply With Quote