View Single Post
Old 04-06-2011, 06:32 PM   #57 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
I remember a post by aerohead where he quotes an 1986,SAE Paper 860211 showing that a 15deg hood slope can reduce cd by .0475. That is pretty huge! It is from the technology of cars of the era that my car comes from. When I made the hood splitter I shot for that angle, 15 deg.

So if my car has a cd of .36 stock that and the paper says 16% less wind drag, that makes it about .31. If half of my drag is from aero that means that I might have 8% less overall drag. My previous tank was 47.7 mpg. An 8% increase says 51.5 mpg My car got 50.1 over 500 miles.
Yes if the hood is too horizontal and the front end too blunt and sharply radiussed then the hood experiences non-laminar flow so it stands to reason if changes are made such that flow over the hood straightens out then drag goes down.

I'm sorry, don't take it personally, but to use that to leap to your second paragraph makes no sense. Look at any Rabbit in a wind tunnel, or Hucho's book, and you'll see that VW did angle the hood and radius the leading edge of the hood properly so too bad, I'd wager you are stuck with .36, blister or not.
__________________


  Reply With Quote