View Single Post
Old 04-11-2011, 12:31 PM   #61 (permalink)
Christ
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Because the engine hadn't begun putting out any more power as a result of the part installation. The"net gain"you're referring to isn't a gain, its a reduction in losses through a system of components.

The only factual gain you could truly claim is an efficiency gain because by reducing the rotating mass, you've made the engine work less to accelerate it to the same speed, and by slowing down the accessories that it drives, you've brought the belt drive closer to 1:1, making the interface ratio more efficient, meaning less hp is used. You still haven't made any more hp from the engine though.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
darcane (04-11-2011)