View Single Post
Old 04-11-2011, 07:11 PM   #73 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
it doesn't

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
You're assuming a bubble is just as aerodynamic as metal. Following that reasoning, why put a boattail on a car when a bubble forms back there in the shape of a boattail anyway?
(1) the bubble IS as aerodynamic as metal.That's the point.
(2) a bubble does not form behind a vehicle in the form of a boat-tail unless you're talking about the last 15% of the 'Template' which is superflous anyway do to ground clearance.
Hucho made a grave contextual error when referring to Lay's wind tunnel research and the drag reducing contribution of the tail.
Kamm's comments MUST be taken in context as to the value of a tail
Ditto Fachsenfeld
Ditto Korff
Ditto Alberto Morelli ( he removed only 16% from the back of the CNR banana car,not 50% as inferred in some articles concerning the K-form).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you add out to 70% boat tail,based on the 'Template' you can expect no appreciable drag penalty.The air WILL pass over a phantom tail area from 70% rearwards.
  Reply With Quote