View Single Post
Old 04-11-2011, 10:42 PM   #77 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
There's a weird tendency on this forum to think attached flow is all that matters for drag... I think it's just a bandwagon mentality--- a few members who consider themselves experts constantly talk about attached flow, and that becomes the common wisdom. But what also matters is the energy it takes to move air aside. Just because you have a bubble making airflow look nice in a wind tunnel doesn't mean it's not taking more energy than if the "bubble" was made of metal.
Citations... or... anything?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-12-2011), Christ (04-11-2011)