View Single Post
Old 04-25-2011, 09:53 PM   #78 (permalink)
cleanspeed1
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redyaris View Post
when you think of replacing your present Truck is fuel consumption the primary consideration? How many miles does your truck travel in a year on $40k? I am at the other end of the fuel cost spectrum in that I spend $1200 -$1500 per year to travel 32000km [20000 miles]. Yet I am still willing to invest $1000 - $3000 per year, in efforts to get down to 3.3L/100km [71mpg] as my 'fleet' average. Even though at the outset the return on investment does not look that good. The way I look at it is; I am insulating myself from future price rises. I suspect in your case a 5% reduction in fuel consumption represents $2000 savings in money but also a reduction in maintainance cost as well. Big trucks are in the same aerodynamic boat as motorcycle; real bad aero. The best ones I have seen in Canada are the bulk haulers with trailers that have the space under the deck between the wheels enclosed. What I have often wondered is why truckers have not built some form of cargo bays under the trailer deck much like the cargo space under a gray hound bus, which they could use for small inter city loads, to help both aerodynamics and generate extra income from the fuel already being used.
The problem with the trailer design is that the vast majority of docks are a certain height and if you use what amounts to a belly drop trailer ( like a moving trailer or a cattle trailer ) you can't unload. But as far as what you asked in the beginning, you are talking 125k-150k on the miles most of the time per year, with idle time ( 8 hours or more consuming a gallon/hr resting, plus time in a dock waiting to get unloaded ). The one truck that was the worst offender was a CAT powered W900 Kenworth ( old flat top with a mechanical 3406B that never ran quite right ) averaged 4.8 to 5.2 mpg loaded. Any improvement means several thousand dollars a year saved.

Here's what I've learned: electronic diesels are better all around when it comes to reliability and power curve shaping. Get the combination right and drive with the right techniques 8+mpg is normal with tons of power. Using an APU instead of idling the truck saves tons of money ( going from a gallon per hour to a gallon every 8-10 hours ) and saves the engine. Evans Coolant is the best thing since sliced bread ( lasts the life of the vehicle and has a 375 degree boiling point with a zero running pressure; no more busted water pumps, blown head gaskets and better thermal efficiency ). The best aerodynamic truck built was a Peterbilt 372 ( called it the Winnebago ) that was the first semi to get 10 mpg loaded ( had to get killed, it was too good ) and that was 20+ years ago.
  Reply With Quote