View Single Post
Old 04-28-2011, 07:53 PM   #40 (permalink)
p38fln
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 79

Escape #2 - '13 Ford Escape Titanium

C-max - '17 Ford C-Max SE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Ok, I climbed the hill and accelerated on the hill to see what it did - and i can also confirm that it has no DFCO, when going back down the hill, the higher the rpms went, the higher the fuel burn rate went - up to 1 GPH at 3,000 RPM. I couldn't find anywhere that was long enough, steep enough, or deserted enough to see what its real maximum fuel rate was - and 26.9 GPH is really sucking it down as it is!

It appears MPG at WOT at 60 MPH would be 2.23 MPG - probably less

Maximum fuel burn rate - 26.9 GPH
Maximum boost pressure - 14.1 PSI
Maximum fuel rail pressure - 1,975.4 PSI
Maximum spark advance - +40.00°
Minimum spark advance - -7.50°
Avg spark advance -- 19.03°
Maximum intake camshaft angle -- 50.4°
Minimum intake camshaft angle -- -1.0°
Average intake camshaft angle -- 14.0°
(I forgot to turn on logging on the exhaust camshaft angle)

Air fuel ratio - Max -- 29.28:1
Air fuel ratio - Min -- 11.05:1
Air fuel ratio - Avg -- 16.70:1
(Not sure how accurate this part is - the highest LAMBDA value recorded was 1.050:1 and the lowest was 0.749:1, with an average of 0.983:1)

Last edited by p38fln; 04-28-2011 at 08:10 PM..
  Reply With Quote