View Single Post
Old 05-12-2011, 02:19 AM   #68 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I've already gone 10x further on MKII than MKI. It definitely doesn't turn as sharp as a standard bicycle; however, at 65" wheelbase it is the same as many other recumbents.

The front wheel being that far ahead doesn't make for hard steering- in fact it turns too easily and sort of wants to swing around back and caster- hence the need for more rake. When I rake it out I think I'll reduce the trail... or, more likely, I'll try the drive fork the way it is and if I hate it I'll straighten it out. Just like with the rake- I knew the theory but tested it anyway; now I know it's reality for this contraption at least.

P.S. That excess framework on the bottom of the "drive fork" will go away eventually.

Yes I realize it's much uglier than MKI... with the changes soon to come it should look better and even if not, hopefully it'll get covered up with bodywork...
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 05-12-2011 at 02:49 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Christ (05-12-2011)