View Single Post
Old 05-20-2011, 03:12 AM   #77 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
No, there are 2 ways the sidewall information is expressed:

1) Max Load XXXX at YY pressure

2) Max Load XXXX, Max Pressure YY

For Standard Load Passenger car tires with speed ratings T and lower, the first configuration is sometimes used.

For H and higher speed ratings you will see the 2nd configuration. But sometimes you'll see the 2nd configuration for T and lower.

These 2 configurations are not equivalent statements.

And I should warn you that for some reason Kumho uses the first configuration in a misleading way. So for the purposes of this discussion, let's stay away from the way Kumho is doing it, as it just confuses the matter more.
What is misleading about the first designation? It is a very common way of expressing exactly what I am asserting, load peaks with sidewall pressure maximum.

I just read the ratings off 6 different tire brands I have.

Yokohama (LT), Kumho (ZR), Big O (T) and Bridgestone (H) are printed as #1.
Michelin (V) and Dunlop (ZR) are printed as #2.

The second way of printing the rating does not state the load rating decreases with increased pressure. That is your position, correct?
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote