Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago
Appeals to authority, such as this pathetic paragraph above, are typically used by people who have a weak argument to begin with. I could claim any number of things on the internet, but unless they're backed up by real-world results that others can repeat, the claims are worth nothing.
I'll put my own knowledge up against this gadget of yours any day, Heihetech. I don't need some fabricated award claim from a non-SAE sanctioned contest to do it, either. The internal combustion engine is inherently a thermodyamic beast, which is something you can't seem to fathom. In order to intelligently discuss any form of fuel savings from modifying the basic operation of a thermodynamic engine such as the internal combustion engine we're all familiar with, it's necessary to resort to thermodynamics. Otherwise, you will (and did) forget something crucial.
Here's a question for you, genius. Name all of the forms (not manufacturer trade names) of variable displacement that exist for the internal combustion engine.
|
As an inventor, I made DCD controller, and having it tested on real vehicles
for years. It is real-world results that others can repeat, not only claims on
the paper and internet. Thermodynamics is only a tool for the invention, it
self is not an invention.
SAE??? There was no such orgnization when Henry Ford had built his first
automotive vehicle. Why DCD invention should be limited by SAE?
Sorry, I'm not an expert of variable displacement engine. If you are, you
may show us something, letting us know how affordable it is. But as I have
told everybody, DCD does make engine displacement variable, only by most
affordable retrofitting, in time and expense.
How about your variable displacement engine? I wonder?