View Single Post
Old 05-31-2011, 03:39 PM   #179 (permalink)
320touring
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,434

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
I've noticed that newer versions of certain engines have gone back to 2 valves per cylinder, but I couldn't guess why
2v per cyl gives more torque at low rpm's whereas multi valves give better torque at higher rpm..

I imagine with cars being heavier today, and cars being used in situations where higher speed is not important (rush hour traffic), then torque is what you're after.

More bangs per buck per unit of fuel to move a heavy car..

does that make sense?

I have to state this is purely only my theory!
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 320touring For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (06-01-2011)