View Single Post
Old 06-01-2011, 11:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
The high torque starter has a gear reduction which means it can start the engine with a smaller electric motor and most likely fewer amps. It also weighs a bit less. But to be quite honest, unless the one in your car is going out, there isn't an advantage to swapping it out.

Newer cars are going to high torque starters, which are likely cheaper to manufacture, and fit into tight spaces easier. So the availability of parts are better than for the old school starters, making it a favorite of starter rebuilders.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote