As promised I tested the theory today, mainly becouse I had hopes that the vortexes would reattach the flow even at a greater angle.

I have acces to a flowbank, mainly used for engine tuning (flowing channels).

So today I made a setup through which I could visiualize the flow attachmend with

__different angles __and with smooth and stepped surfaces.

I made a basic druplet shape buth with squared top and sides.

For the modelling of the exact shape I used a kind of clay.

@cfg83 CFD simulations were pretty acurate, but his models were shown at a relative low angel of attack. (which I could make out from the vids)

Brief Summary:

Test with a smooth "druplet kind of shape" shows deattached flow at angles above +/-17degrees.

Test with relative big steps.

Showed attachemend also till 17 degrees, you could clearly see that the flow was turbulant right after the step and reattached half way a step.

See the picture below to give you an idea how the flow unfolded. Red=turbulant

Yellow=laminair

Test with smaller steps.

The flow was often turbulant but reattached with the shallow angle of about 11 degrees.

See picture

Conclusion

__Stepped shapes have the same flow-attachment angle as a smooth surface, but the flow must have a chance to reattach to a surface.__