View Single Post
Old 07-08-2011, 07:50 AM   #80 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Y'all are barking up the wrong tree and ignoring something important.

The reason to have an electric vehicle is to make use of electricity from the power grid, which is produced very efficiently, but as I understand it, is also subsidized to allow poor people the ability to afford it. Producing electricity will always incur energy losses as per the law of conservation of energy. This law states energy cannot be created nor destroyed so no matter how electricity is produced, some energy must be lost.

According to the wiki on the nissan leaf, using a 120 volt charger connection will consume 1.4 kWh to add 5 miles to the range. Using the 220 volt charger would add 11.7 miles to the range and consume 3.3 kWh. These amounts of electricity are easily produced by a portable generator, but add very little to the range. And this is dealing with a highly efficient electric car. There is a generator that can easily produce that power for the cost of .3 gallon per hour, which would give you a mpg rating of 33 mpg at a speed of 11.7 mph. Here is a picture of it.

__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote