Hi, I'm new here. I'd like to chime in with a comment that's indirectly related.
Recently I read an article about BSFC (
http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_110216/article.html). This made me think about pumping losses, so I tried something new. I drove about 350 miles ('95 VX) while trying hard to avoid any throttle setting other than about 70%. This meant I was doing a lot of P&G.
I was pretty stunned at the result: 70 mpg. On other recent fills, I had been doing about 50 mpg.
I'd like to do more testing, and repeat the result, before I decide it's real. On the prior tank, I had overfilled, somewhat, so that might be a factor. But it sure gives the impression that pumping losses are a big deal.
The result is especially surprising on my car, because the large throttle opening pretty much means that I'm spending little or no time in lean-burn mode. So my initial conclusion is that minimizing pumping losses is a more powerful strategy than relying on lean burn.
I have a feeling that P&G is so effective for some people because they are avoiding small throttle settings, and therefore minimizing pumping losses.
Apologies if I'm repeating things that are already obvious to you folks!