View Single Post
Old 07-12-2011, 08:56 AM   #1 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
Why so many rounded corners on the TE?

Looking at yet another vortex thread, I was reminded that while automakers go to some length to trip the flow over the top of the car smoothly with a sharp transition, they still have rather large radiui on the sides of a few inches?




So I still don't get how sharp transition is good for the top and radiused is good for the sides. My hunch-made-in-ignorance is that the radiused sides improve crosswind handling at a slight aero penalty, and possibly it is partly aesthetic, and rounded corners on the rear bumper make some sense as well, if you do any bumping. Is it because the top is generally tapered where the sides are not? That is harder yet to comprehend.

Has anyone ever actually tested sharp vertical corners? There are a few seemingly conflicting opinion pages, but I have yet to see results.

__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote