View Single Post
Old 08-01-2011, 11:11 PM   #30 (permalink)
kir_kenix
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Allch Chcar brings up a really good point about the actual chemical composition of ethanol enriched fuels. Most e-10 fuels are an 89 octane, but I have seen some pumps spread out over the country that were advertised as e-10 at 87 octane.

I've been trying to dig up the emission/mpg test that the epa ran on the new 2009 vehicles. If I remember correctly, most of the newer sedans brought in about 85% the mileage on e-85 as they did on 87oct.

Higher compression, smaller volume engines are begining to narrow the gap in mpg on ethanol fuels. I think that we can expect that most new vehicles will range anywhere from 11.5-13:1 compression ratios in the coming years.
  Reply With Quote