View Single Post
Old 08-08-2011, 09:46 AM   #14 (permalink)
Quasimoto
Quasi-Modder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DeForest, Wisconsin
Posts: 144
Thanks: 23
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...*IF* a 2nd-order polynomial equation holds true, you should be getting about 47.7 mpg @ 50 mph and about 50.9 mpg @ 45 mph--assuming you're not lugging the engine at those lower speeds.

...I did a regression analysis on your mpg values at 55, 60 and 65 and the 2nd-order polynomial equation came up with R-squared = 1.0 (perfect):

MPG = 0.0148*(MPH^2) - 2.0419*(MPH) + 112.81; RR = 1.0000

...do those numbers sound 'close' to what you're actually getting at those speeds?
I really haven't tested at those MPH's. But I would expect those results to hold true. I wish I was as good at math as you are.
  Reply With Quote