View Single Post
Old 08-09-2011, 07:37 PM   #60 (permalink)
suspectnumber961
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 547

highcountryexplorer - '86 Nissan 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 21.78 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Ford Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 32.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 78 Times in 65 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quasimoto View Post
Actually it nothing to do with a ships bulbous bow. The extension is actually an airfoil; a reverse wing. If you look at some of the earlier pics you can see the shape. I made it upside down because it fit the contour of the car better. The effect is the same either way. Airfoils and Airflow [Ch. 3 of See How It Flies]
Section 3.8 on inverted flight.
I know you made it...but I think the resemblance to a wing has no more relevance to it's effect than it's resemblance to a bulbous ship's bow.

Because the bulbous ships bow and the front of a wing are almost identical in cross-section?

My under-educated guess is that the mpg gain effect comes from having a large and smoothly contoured shape in the most high pressured position on the vehicle so that this high pressured air (resistance) is dealt with more effectively....routed back over the car...as undisturbed as possible.

AND...it looks like better mpg gains than for a partial Kammback? And EVERYBODY says that what's at back matters most??????

Hope your before and after testing is valid.....

note: don't let this opinion bum you out...you made it...you should call it what you want!
__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. GALLUP POLL
  Reply With Quote