08-11-2011, 03:58 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldbeaver
Now, in a Otto engine you put, say, 100 of gas energy and get 20% out of it as movement, the rest is lost. In the process, some energy is spent in preparing gas to burn (compression), inject gas, etc.. This energy is less than the one we get out of gasoline. Therefore, there is 20% of utility energy. We get some energy out of it all for us to use.
In the case of HOH, we get some energy out of water too. Water is a fuel, just like gasoline. Unfortunately, preparing water (electrolysis) takes a lot of energy, actually more than we get out of it by combustion of H in the engine.
At least, for me is so. In one case algebraic sum is negative, in the other is positive. Is a practical thing. Laws are there and practical things are here. And they BOTH work.
This is the way I see it.
|
So for the 20% utility case, you add the "HOH" system and then get 18% or less utility. And you would consider this an option?
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|