View Single Post
Old 08-16-2011, 05:08 PM   #15 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Once again the gains are at the rear. I don't know why mirrors would be any different than any other body being pushed through the wind- except that they are usually located in an accelerated air flow zone from the greenhouse. Anyway if an object is too blunt for the air flow's liking, the air takes care of it itself by forming a largely stagnant bubble. Thus I wouldn't predict any sizable gains, if anything at all, from elongating or rounding the front of the mirror housing. We know how awful the flow can be coming off the rear though- it's a major source of wind noise.
__________________


  Reply With Quote