View Single Post
Old 08-16-2011, 06:44 PM   #20 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,183
Thanks: 128
Thanked 2,804 Times in 1,969 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
I think there may be some gains available on the front. Take a look at this: Shape Effects on Drag

The rounded-front bullet shape has about 1/4 the drag of a flat plate.
Good link.

Another crazy idea, gold ball dimples?

In addition to the Goldfish or truncated teardrop shape?

EDIT.....did some more searching, and found a similar thread.

http://www.gassavers.org/showthread.php?t=6054

Quote:
The gray semi-circle at the right end represents a 2" convex mirror. The gray triangle in the background is the mount on the car.
Quote:
However at the trailing edge, a taper to a thin tip or edge is a good thing. It encourages the airflow to rejoin itself smoothly. An airplane wing is a good example of both the rounded blunt leading edge and a tapered trailing edge.
Quote:
I really should edit that wikipedia article that seems to be responsible for perpetuating the bs that a Kamm back can create some sort of virtual and equivalent teardrop shape. It can't. It's an engineering trade-off. You cut it sharply at the point of diminishing returns. Most of the drag of a truncated teardrop will be in proportion to the cross sectional area of the truncation.
Back in about 1980 I put some bullet mirrors on my 1966 Mustang similar to this.
http://www.midlandwheels.com/Shop/P-...et-Mirror.html


I'm now looking at these with a new insight.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 08-16-2011 at 06:58 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
TOOQIKK (08-18-2011)