View Single Post
Old 08-21-2011, 03:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I think Craig is simply trying to take HIS econo challenge in a different direction from the first ones, which evolved into competition-only machines and conditions. He now wants competition results for everyman. Now he's saying, no puny underpowered non-practical non-fun machine that WON'T be the first choice of what to drive/ride in a stable full of vehicle options. To that end, there will be no puttering around at sub-speed limit speeds. There will be no wimpy machines that can't maintain the speed limit up hills and into headwinds. There will be no crumpling up into a little ball for a ride of over 100 miles duration. There will be room for stuff, as that is what often happens when people go out and about- they need to carry some stuff. This is all common sense, people. Of course the most objective measurement of all would be the same dyno routine the EPA uses. But where's the fun in that? Who would be excited about the contest and want to build and enter if there was only a dyno run?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cd (09-02-2011)