View Single Post
Old 08-31-2011, 02:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
JRMichler
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,017

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
Just for the fun of it, let's calculate potential savings. First, get the alternator efficiency up to 90%. Second, change all lighting to the latest technology LED. Third, a more efficient (ECM?) blower motor. The total electrical load would drop from 20 amps down to about 6 amps, for a savings of 14 X 13 volts = 180 watts. The engine power needed would drop from 260 / 0.5 = 520 watts down to 6 X 13 / 0.9 = 87 watt, for a savings of 430 watts.

430 watts / 746 = 0.58 hp. Multiply by 0.4 lbs fuel per hp-hour = 0.23 lbs per hour fuel saved = 0.039 gallons per hour. Assuming 40 MPG at an average speed of 40 MPH, the fuel used would drop from 1.00 gallons per hour down to 0.961 gallons per hour. MPG would increase from 40 MPG up to 41.6 MPG. Those getting better mileage would get a larger gain, those getting less mileage would get a smaller gain. Certain practical realities, such as the fact that engine efficiency decreases at lower loads, will make the real world MPG gain less.

If I put in LED bulbs, it will be for reliability, not MPG. I can also get reliability by replacing every single bulb when the first one burns out.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
Longsnowsm (07-22-2015), mikeyjd (05-16-2014), Xist (07-23-2015)