I think as you confine testing to a particular stretch of road, and that your notes include conditions present, that your test record over a years time will show an average that can be maintained without always running slowly.
So, to take your mind off aero for a moment:
Another suggestion is an airspeed indicator: Yes, it's nice to have a tailwind to get a one-tank (meaningless) high mpg. But it's the average that counts (and experience in operating under defined -- and differing -- conditions). If the average winds up being 14.75 mpg on an annual basis, then an airspeed indicator allows you (with Scangauge) to, say, speed up a little on the favorable portions of road, and then drop back on the return trip; the goal being to maintain the average rather than a one-tank record.
The airspeed indicator will tell you
a great deal about winds on a two-laner with opposing traffic. Finding the correct travel speed is what I am trying to say is not always obvious. The old MOBIL ECONOMY RUN teams would haul ass under favorable conditions . . but it took plenty of work and understanding to know
how & when!
Warmups can be minimized with block/pan heaters, etc. If the initial fill is 30+ miles down the road, and the next is prior to entering metro traffic (preferably more than 100 miles), I think you've "captured" the high mpg point.
As opposed to a car, handling a truck
ideally means much longer distances for acceleration, braking, etc. And a huge emphasis on mirrors (which is why I'd never go down in size, but maybe in shape). Thus any untoward motions from pure lane-centered-ness carry a heavy penalty at the end of the run as all actions cannot be recalled (so to speak), unlike a car where the penalty is meaningless (almost).
The RV.net crowd probably has an opinion on which of these is best:
Safe T Plus
Steer Safe
The Kevin Rutherford/Bruce Mallinson Class 8 Glider Kit tractor has rack & pinion steering.
.