View Single Post
Old 09-07-2011, 07:44 PM   #8 (permalink)
320touring
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,434

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Web site attachments are blocked on the other computer I use, I could not see it.

Now the question is how much torque is needed?

Engine torque required to drive the car with 1:1 and 3.45 will be less than engine torqure need to drive 1:0.8 and 3.15.
After regearing you will require more torque at a much lower RPM, it should be do-able.
It loooks like There may be the option to re time the Cams to increase lower RPM torque..

That needs further investigation
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote