View Single Post
Old 09-08-2011, 12:21 PM   #16 (permalink)
slowmover
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
While I may not be able to quantify any real improvement in mileage my feeling is surface drag is much lower than an old oxidized faded finish. Even if not, I would still do the same thing.


I agree with this. A clean car that sheds dirt/water easily (and is easily cleaned topside and bottomside) is one where problems are more easily spotted. As in my above post, anything that causes dirt, bugs, rain, etc less chance to adhere to glass and metal make for better visibility and for being seen more easily.

If it also has the benefit of being a bit more slippery, then it's icing on the cake. It certainly has the benefit of maintaining a higher resale value.

The last few mpg on a 50-mpg car hardly show a cash benefit (where the expectation is 35-mpg EPA). It's no less ridiculous, in other words.

.
  Reply With Quote