View Single Post
Old 10-03-2011, 02:13 PM   #14 (permalink)
Diesel_Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Tyler View Post
i don't think desiel ngine economy is helped by the constant pressure combusion, it would be better if it was at constant volume. Deisel engine consumption is hurt by not having a stoiciometric mixture, let me explian like this: the efficiency of an engine, all else being equal, is related to the ratio of the maximum temp to the minimum. The minimum depends greatly on the expansion ratio, and here the diesel does well, but the highest temperature at the top of the stroke is accieved with a chemically correct mixture, and also in the shortest time.
With a diesel with constant pressure the fuel is injected over a period of time, lowering temperatures and efrficiency over what it could be, and also the fuel that burns further down the power stroke is expanded with a lower ratio.
If both engines ran the same compression ratio, you would be correct that a diesel is less efficient. This page explains the details better than I can here:
http://www.classle.net/sites/default...ual_cycles.pdf
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote