View Single Post
Old 10-08-2011, 01:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,456

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,211
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dremd View Post
Look at it this way, if less Fuel is being sold, less wear is being put on the roads, so the tax should work out about right (up until you get to very few liters and base (time only) wear on roads.)
Great point! Not only less wear on the roads, but less demand for expanding roadway capacity since there are less vehicles on the road.

As much as I despise rising fuel costs, it's an inevitable and necessary evil. I'm looking forward to EVs, and eventually, autonomous vehicles, but fossil fuels must be priced out of the market before these other things are developed and implemented.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote