View Single Post
Old 10-08-2011, 03:44 PM   #210 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
Trip Data review:Sept 19- Oct.3,2011

First of all,I had a 5-hour phone conversation with the Femmebot last night so I'm not as far along with the data as I would like.
And I'm close to the deadline for my income tax and will have to re-direct my energies for awhile.
Here's some of what I've gleaned so far.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the log-book:
*Tank#1 Denton-Albuquerque,NM,65 mph cruise,76 mph max velocity,moving ave.62 mph,-------------------- 28.753 mpg ( more details later )-----------
*Tank#2 Albuquerque-Green River,UT,65 mph,80 mph max velocity,
------------------------------- 31.749 mpg -------------------------------
*Tank #3 Green River-Lake Side,UT (Tooele ),65 mph cruise,71 mph max velocity------------------------ 30.909 mpg -------------------------------
*Tank#4 Lake Side-Salt Flats,UT,65 mph cruise,71 mph max velocity
------------------------------- 29.583 mpg --------------------------------
*Tank#5 Salt Flats-Winnemucca,NV,65 mph cruise,75 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 31.625 mpg -----------------------------
*Tank#6 Winnemucca-Carson City,NV-Winnemucca,65 mph cruise,75 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 30.842 mpg -----------------------------
* Tank#7 Winnemucca-Salt Flats,65 mph cruise,75 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 31.781 mpg------------------------------
*Tank#8 Salt Flats-Lake Side,65 mph cruise,69 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 30.674 mpg -----------------------------
*Tank#9 Lake Side-Green River,65 mph cruise,77 mph max velocity ( moving ave 57 mph)
-------------------------------- 31.282 mpg -----------------------------
*Tank#10 Green River-Exit#149,Colorado Springs,CO,65 mph,79 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 28.868 mpg ( details later)----------------
*Tank#11 Colo,Sprgs-Trinidad,CO,65 mph,85 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 47.923 mpg -----------------------------
*Tank#12 Trinidad-Dona Ana,NM,65 mph cruise,79 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 32.63 mpg ------------------------------
*Tank#13 Dona Ana-Cloudcroft,NM,65 mph,72 mph max velocity
-------------------------------- 30.452 mpg -----------------------------
*Tank#14 Cloudcroft-Artesia,NM,55 mph cruise,62 mph max velocity,52 mph moving ave.
-------------------------------- 33.699 mpg -----------------------------
*Tank#15 Artesia-Denton,TX,55 mph cruise,63 mph max velocity,moving ave. 53 mph
-------------------------------- 33.918 mpg -----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total trip: 4,212-miles,134.178 gallons,31.391 mpg ave.
65 mph portion---------------------- 31.046 mpg ave.
55 mph portion---------------------- 33.882 mpg ave.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denton-Albuquerque:28.753 mpg
One-way
613-miles
7,915-feet vertical ascent
3,665-feet vertical descent
41 topographical reference points
1 overnight stay with cold restart,low 50s F
N wind ( windmills pumping,flags straight out,wind generators operating)
Stop signs,stop lights,traffic,road construction delays
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Green River-Colo.Springs: 28.868 mpg
One-way
411-miles
11,304 feet vertical ascent
8,990 feet vertical descent
37 topographical reference points
Stops,traffic,road construction delays
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colo.Springs-Trinidad: 47.923 mpg ( new record )
One-way
135 miles
2,029 feet vertical ascent
2,449 feet vertical descent
10 topographical reference points
45-degree F/high 70sF
26-mph N wind ( perfect tailwind)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old Record: 39.131 mpg
Roundtrip,Lindsay,TX-Electra,TX
200-miles
45 mph ( WW-III Emergency National Fuel Rationing speed limit )
869 feet vertical ascent
869 feet vertical descent
11 topographical reference points
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
General observations:
The data comparisons in some cases are apples and oranges due to different test velocities.
This year,with the trailer,MPG was better than last year without the trailer,but overall maximum cruise velocity was lower by 10-15 mph depending on the segment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cloudcroft-Denton 55-mph testing will be a continuing protocol and I did have results for past years (this run is where the CRX scored 82 mpg at 55-mph in 1995 ).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Artesia-Denton:
This year,with the 682-lb weight penalty,the 33.918 mpg is lower than last year's 34.264 mpg without the trailer,although,was 2.105 mpg better than in 2009 when I made the same run,also,of course,without the trailer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is more data,but I'm kind of burned out right now and I'd like to catch up on other's threads.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loose conclusions:
On flat land the trailer should be zero mpg liability.She weighs as much as the 'production' trailer,with a complete Nissan Leaf Lithium ion pack [410-lbs (186kg)].
It should be possible for a plug in EV to pull the trailer,containing a second pack and double its range ( highway only!).
When 'finished' she may show a net 'gain.'
Mountain driving shows a penalty I think.
It would be instructive to take a bone stock T-100,strap on the trailer with no other mods and see what it would do by itself.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll add data as time permits.
She's still an unknown quantity,but the 47.9 mpg run illustrates the relative importance of streamlining.Getting the Cd down lower will be the same as a continuous tailwind when on the highway.See you all later.

Last edited by aerohead; 10-15-2011 at 02:50 PM.. Reason: data correction Tank#1
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
orbywan (10-08-2011)