View Single Post
Old 10-13-2011, 03:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
You can't say warm or cold air is better and have that be that. It is completely dependant on engine design and programming. However, warm air is generally better for fuel efficiency. It is less dense, so it requires a larger throttle opening for the same amount of power. A larger throttle opening reduces pumping losses and increases BSFC. Warmer air also speeds combustion which also increases efficiency. If you go too warm (again totally dependant on what engine you have), you can may run into issues with retarding timing. However, switching to a higher octane fuel would remedy that issue. Most cars love 100+F air, they start getting quirky around 140F from what I've read (again it differs from engine to engine).
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (10-13-2011), jkv357 (10-14-2011)