View Single Post
Old 10-17-2011, 05:53 AM   #13 (permalink)
HAHA
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 37

Hydroline3 - '09 Mitsubishi L200 Business, Double cab
90 day: 40.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I just finished a trip and a tank using some advice from this thread. Specifically, I throttled harder during the pulse phase. The vehicle is a, currently not very aerodynamic, diesel pick-up truck with manual transmission. The engine puts out some serious torque in a 1000 rpm band so the truck accelerates quickly even in steep inclinations when flooring it. Therefore I used p&g consistently even in inclinations despite the gliding phase suffering. Previously I used to keep a steady speed uphills.
Anyway, the net result was a very good improvement. I got 6.5 liter/10 km one way and 6.0 the other way. Previous figures for this run was about 7.4 when driving with a gasoline style p&g. For comparison, running on cruise control yields 8.7.

Now the question:
Since this vehicle is "a brick" and does not glide well, there are a pretty large number of acceleration phases for a given distance. The engine and turbo is larger than your average car so the turbo lag is significant. It takes a couple of seconds until the torque wave kicks in, especially in highest gear. This means I am flooring it without getting much in return a lot of the time.
Is this really the best way of applying power?

The built in fuel meter only averages consumption over longer time so I can't study this in real time. Anyone with knowledge on modern diesels that can say something about the typical engine mapping and efficiency before the turbo starts producing?
Should I gear down to reduce lag and have shorter pulses? (more rpm and transmission losses and more wear on tyres etc.)
Should I apply power more progressively and not floor it at once?
  Reply With Quote